Democrat Party Weaknesses Revealed Amid Ongoing Govt. Shutdown
WASHINGTON D.C. — A scathing op-ed published in The Hill by conservative analyst Liz Peek highlights a growing "civil war" within the Democratic Party that could derail their prospects for the 2026 midterms. As the government shutdown enters its second month, moderate leadership is increasingly being held hostage by a radicalized progressive wing.
The Schumer vs. AOC Standoff
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is reportedly shifting to a more hardline, obstructionist stance
on the budget to ward off a potential primary challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
The Numbers: Polling from Data for Progress shows Schumer trailing AOC by a staggering 19 points in a hypothetical primary matchup.
The Shift: Critics point out that Schumer, once an outspoken opponent of government shutdowns, is now leading one to maintain his standing with the "socialist" base of the party.
The Rise of the "Socialist" Candidates
In the country's largest urban centers, far-left candidates are successfully ousting or challenging moderate incumbents:
New York City: Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani is currently leading former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the race for Mayor. Mamdani’s campaign has been fueled by massive donations from progressive billionaires like Elizabeth Simons and Soros-linked groups.
Minneapolis: While socialist Omar Fateh is attempting to unseat Mayor Jacob Frey, he recently suffered a major blow when the Minnesota DFL (Democrat-Farmer-Labor) rescinded their endorsement following fraud allegations.
A Strategic Failure in Swing States
While "defund the police" and "abolish ICE" rhetoric resonates in deep-blue pockets like Brooklyn or Minneapolis, Peek argues it is "poison" in swing states like Pennsylvania and Ohio. With Trump successfully occupying the "all-powerful center," Democrats are perceived as being obsessed with endless spending and open-border policies—positions that are increasingly out of step with the majority of the American electorate.
The House on Thursday failed to adopt a war powers resolution that attempted to curtail President Donald Trump's military actions in Iran.
It failed by a vote of 212-219. Republican Reps. Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson bucked GOP leaders by voting in favor; four Democrats voted against the resolution: Reps. Henry Cuellar, Jared Golden, Greg Landsman and Juan Vargas.
The resolution, which only expresses the sentiment of Congress, called on the president to terminate the use of U.S. armed forces in hostilities against Iran or any part of the Iranian government or military unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force is enacted.
The measure was non-binding and not subject to the president's signature or veto.
Speaker Mike Johnson argued Wednesday that the United States is "not at war" but only engaged in a "defensive operation" in Iran.
“We're not at war right now,” Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. “We're in -- four days into a very specific, clear mission and operation."
Later on Wednesday, Trump contradicted Johnson, repeatedly referring to the conflict in Iran as a "war" hours after Johnson said it wasn't.
Sitting next to Johnson during a roundtable on energy prices, Trump said "we're doing very well on -- on the war front, to put it mildly."
A U.S. Army High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) launches from an undisclosed location in support Operation Epic Fury.
US Army
May you like
Johnson had said that the "passage of a war powers resolution right now would be a terrible, dangerous idea."
"It would empower our enemies. It would kneecap our own forces, and it would take the ability of the U.S. military and the commander in chief away from completing this critical mission to keep everybody safe," he said Wednesday.
